A Quick Overview of Statis Pro, My Favorite Baseball Simulation

I’m sure a lot of you have played baseball simulation games, whether on a computer, gaming console, website or board game.  For those of you who have gone the board game route, I’m sure most of you have played either Strat-O-Matic (the “industry leader”) or APBA (beloved by many).

Me, I can’t go mainstream on anything.  I grew up playing this:
Statis Pro Box Front
…The full title being the unwieldy “Statis Pro Major League Game Of Professional Baseball”, which everybody shortens to “Statis Pro”.

Here’s a view of the gameboard set up (more or less) for gameplay.
Statis-Pro Game board and charts
Don’t be intimidated by all of the charts… The game is intended to be a detailed simulation of Major League baseball, going as far as having rainouts, injuries and ejections, but gameplay can easily be simplified if you’re just looking to have a bit of tabletop fun.

I was 13 when I got my copy (with cards simulating the 1978 season).  The reason I got this particular game was because at the time I was fascinated by the war simulation games put out by a company called Avalon Hill.  I loved strategy games like Risk and Stratego, and Avalon Hill was a big time provider of games for the serious tabletop gamer.  Even the packaging was serious;  they called them “Bookshelf Games” and they came in a box that would stand upright on a shelf, for you to proudly display next to your copies of Gray’s Anatomy and the complete works of Ernest Hemingway.

Here’s the side and back of the Statis Pro box.
Statis Pro box side and back

I turned out to be wrong about the war simulations being appealing to me, but from many hours of poring over the Avalon Hill catalog, I became intrigued by Avalon Hill’s sports games.

Besides, Statis Pro made me a promise that Strat & APBA couldn’t make:  the game came with instructions and formulas for making your own player cards.

“Make your own player cards”?!?

Oh, the mind reeled.  I could create cards for any player, for any team, from any point in history!  I could create a card for myself, and I could play against Major Leaguers!  How exciting!

The process of creating the cards turned out to be more labor-intensive than I’d realized, especially given that I got the game a good 12 years before I owned my first computer.  However, the ability to create cards has had one interesting and long-lasting side effect – even though Statis-Pro has officially been gone for over 20 years, it still has a following and people still generate card sets that they sell on eBay or make available for downloading.

Just for fun, I did make a couple of player cards, but I’ll come back to that after I give you a rough idea of how the game works.

Like most games of this sort, there’s a sort of “random number generator” aspect behind it… but rather than using dice, there’s a deck of “Fast Action Cards” with numbers on them.

Statis-Pro Fast Action Deck

These cards generally simulate the roll of two dice through the “PB” factor in the upper left.  What makes it different from using dice is that there are cards that have other “PB” factors, and those can lead to errors, clutch batting or clutch defense, along with the odd occurrences I’d mentioned before.

One of the more interesting features of the game is that each pitcher has a rating that corresponds to the “PB” number on the Fast Action Cards.  If the starting pitcher’s rating is equal to or higher than the random number, the result of the at bat comes off of that pitcher’s card;  Otherwise we work off the batter’s card.  So, for example, Dwight Gooden from 1989 has a PB rating of 2-7.
Statis Pro - Dwight Gooden - 1989 Mets
If the number off the Fast Action Card runs from 2 to 7, it means we’re working off of Doc’s card (which, of course, has a better chance of being an out).  Better pitchers might have a rating of 2-8 or 2-9, worse pitchers would have 2-6, 2-5 or less.

Once we know which card is determining the outcome of the play, we pull another Fast Action card and get a different number, one that determines the outcome of the play when you reference either the batter or pitcher’s card.
Statis-Pro Cal Ripken - 1989 Orioles
So, for example, if we were working off of Gooden’s player card and the Fast Action Card had a random number of 33, it would be a strikeout;  but, if the 33 were against Cal Ripken’s card, it would be a homer.

That’s the basic structure of the game, but there are other factors involved.
Pitchers also have another rating that basically determines how long they stick around, and it differs based on whether they’re used as a starter or a reliever.  That way, Mariano Rivera cannot start a game and be lights-out for 9 innings.  Certain events (hits, walks, errors, runs) eat away at the effectiveness rating, and when it gets to zero, the pitcher’s “done” and every result then goes off of the batter’s card until you put another pitcher in.

Gameplay can be as complex or simple as you want to make it.  There are a whole bunch of charts that can be consulted in different situations, but you can ignore them if you want to assume, for example, that all runners advance one base on a single, two bases on a double, and so on.

There’s one last twist in the game…  The “Z” Code.  Some of the cards which determine “pitcher vs. hitter” have a Z code which refers you to the “Unusual play” chart.  More often than not, nothing comes of it and you continue with game play, but the Z code is what leads to players getting injured or ejected, games getting rained out, and so on.

Just for fun, I used the formulas provided by the game to create two player cards… One for Mike Trout, arguably the best position player in the Majors, and one for “Joe Shlabotnik”, which was an attempt to make a utility infielder who would be the worst player in the Majors (but one who still managed to get in over 100 games).
2014 Statis Pro - Shlabotnik and Trout
I played a 9-inning game between a lineup made up of nine Mike Trouts and a lineup made up of nine Shlabotniks, and I skipped the pitcher so that every outcome came off of the batter’s card.  The final score:  Trouts – 15, Shlabotniks – 1

…So that’s the basics regarding Statis Pro. The game has a cult-like following, and if you want evidence of this, check out the “Statis Pro 1984” blog, where the entire 1984 season for every team is being played, and the author has been going at it since 2012.

26 thoughts on “A Quick Overview of Statis Pro, My Favorite Baseball Simulation

  1. I can’t believe I’ve never heard of this. If I was marooned on a desert island I might be pretty content with plenty of water, shade, and a copy of this game. Heck I just spent 15 minutes reading the 1984 blog you linked to at the end!

  2. The only baseball board game I owned as a kid and played religiously was Cadaco.I never knew about these strategy games and back then , If It didn’t have pictures,there was a good chance It got overlooked.Which sucks because I know I would have loved playing this.I got hooked on Baseball Mogul for the PC a few years back and now I casually play older ps1 and Xbox baseball video games.

  3. I had the SI games, wish I still did, but I did have a friend who was really into the Avalon Hill war simulations. I found them too complicated and would quit and just watch my friends play.

  4. Yea, you got a run. That’s something. The first baseball board game I ever got was called Gil Hodges Pennant Fever. Looked a lot like that set up but with dice. I liked it but it was a slow and tedious game for my younger brothers, who I played it with(they all were younger than 10yrs old). Then we ran into a nice simple baseball board game that used round cards with results laid out in cut pie fashion with spinners. It was All Star Baseball. We really got into that big time, playing entire seasons using scorebooks. We must have played that over 3 yrs or so, 162 game seasons. Good times.

  5. Nice post. Thanks for the details. I never played this one. I did play the one with the circular disks.

    Also, I love the cover of the game. The bottom left photo is from the 1972 World Series. And the rest look like Mid-to-late 70’s Yankees photos.

  6. Graet post, Joe. Baseball sims and board games are such fun.

    I went from Challenge the Yankees—>Cadaco—>Strat-O-Matic—->Pursue the Pennant (which I bought and played once I think)—->Diamond Mind, with stops at APBA’s Computer version and Earl Weaver Baseball somewhere along the way.

    I burned myself out getting absorbed in Diamond Mind baseball but I need to get back into it.

    • Earl Weaver Baseball!!! That and “The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy” were my first computer-based games. Boys and girls, these games came on floppy disks back when the disks were truly floppy.

      I had a lot of fun with Earl Weaver Baseball, but I doubt it would hold up (if one could even find a way to run it).

  7. Thanks that I’m not the only one. I have 93 teams From ’50 whiz kid Phils to 2016 curae breaker Cubs
    Made entire 1976 season.
    Nothing like this in the world.
    My brother made ’67 AL and is progressing. a season.

    • That’s awesome that you and your brother have made so many teams! Unfortunately I don’t know of any tournaments…. I’ve only played against myself since sometime in the 1980’s. Good luck finding something!

  8. One adaption I’m doing this year to build up the records, is I give a team a 3-game sweep if they win by 5 or more (without extra innings), and a 2 games to 1 edge for anything closer. I did the math and you have the same chance of a 5-run win as a sweep. Caveat is I’m going to let teams use top relivers to protect a 5-run lead or 4-run deficit. Also my old rule was if a pitcher face 5 to 9 batters he rested 1 game, 10 to 14 he rested 2 and 15 or more he reated 3, and kept every team on a 4-man rotation.

  9. Also said when the pitchers endurance ran out by one, he lost a PB number (2-6 instead of 2-7) etc, so he could still stay out there weaker for a few more batters before it went straight to the batters card. Man you brought back memories – I haven’t played since the 1980s and had just ordered new 2017 cards. For abreal blast find Mickey klutz’s card the year he was a 25-41 on homers with very few at bats when Schmidt was only a 28-38

  10. Pingback: Learning To Play MLB Showdown | The Shlabotnik Report

  11. Pingback: Getting There Is Half Of The Fun | The Shlabotnik Report

  12. I’m using Statis-Pro playing a draft league based on the 1950 season using home brewed cards. It’s the third time I’ve used SP to play games in my league, also with home brewed cards (1998 and 2001 seasons). I have a league website if you are interested in my ramblings. This is now the eighth season of this league format – ten teams, one division of six teams, and a second division of four teams. First division plays 140 games per team and second division plays out a 102 game schedule. There is relegation and promotion between the two divisions. Anyway, check it out when you get a chance. Enjoyed your post!



  13. Pingback: “The Commons Challenge”: A 1959 Topps / Statis Pro Baseball Project | The Shlabotnik Report

  14. Glad to see someone out there also has – end enjoys – the Statis Pro ’78 season! And I agree with your Strat-O/APBA insight…most baseball board game enthusiasts stick with either of those two, while Statis Pro is left by the wayside (and it doesn’t help that the game stopped being made over two decades ago, while the other two are still going strong).

    If you’re still playing that ’78 game, or are still interested in that season, check out my blog site at https://statispro1978replay.wordpress.com/. I’m always glad to have other Statis Pro Baseball fans stop by and visit.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.