1977-1982 Hockey: Could Someone Give Me A Push, Please?

When I was a kid in the 1970’s, when a loaf of bread cost a nickel and we walked two miles uphill in the snow to get to school, we didn’t have year-round baseball sets to collect. If you wanted to buy some cards in the fall or winter, you had to go with other sports or non-sports.

I started off with Football as my winter vice, but from 1977 to 1982 it was hockey that fulfilled my pack-opening needs…. And yet, I’ve never completed a hockey set.

Over the past couple of years I’ve thought of working on one of those hockey sets, but the effort never really gets any momentum behind it… Partly because I have too many goals, but an even bigger reason is because I can never decide which hockey set should be the target of my efforts.

I thought maybe someone could offer insights in to the sets in question, perhaps someone had fun completing the set, or found it to be more trouble than it’s worth… probably somewhere in between.

Just to be clear, I don’t see anything happening with these anytime soon, if it happens at all. I need to finish some other stuff before I could give this a go, but I wanted to at least start thinking about it.

So here we go, starting with…

1977/78
1977-78-topps-bill-fairbairn
Current Status: I’ve got 111 out of 264 (42%)

Pros: This is the first hockey set I collected, so it has some emotional cachet. It’s also the only Topps set to have Cleveland Barons cards, a favorite “Forgotten Franchise” of mine. Finally, there are several photo variations to make things a little more interesting.

Cons: Some of my needs are a little pricey, but not deal-breakers. The design might be a little too reminiscent of 1977 Topps Baseball (with the team name on the bottom and a team logo instead of a pennant).

Even if I never complete the 1977/78 set itself, I’d love to complete the glossy insert set.

1977-78 Topps Hockey Glossy Insert Glenn Resch

1978/79
1978-79-topps-paul-gardner

Current Status: 136 out of 264 (51.5%)

Pros: The second set I collected, obviously.

Cons: I can’t think of much to say about it, which doesn’t bode well for this set’s chances. It’s not a bad design but it’s not a great design.  As it’s the second hockey set I collected, it seems I should love it more than I do.

1979/80
1979-80-topps-hockey-denis-potvin
Current status: 172 out of 264 (65%)

Pros: Probably my favorite all-time hockey set; I’ve always loved this design. It’s also the first set after the WHA was merged in to the NHL, so you’ve got the Whalers, Nordiques, Jets and Oilers in an NHL set for the first time.

And right now you’re saying “Wait a minute… If you love this set so much, why are you even asking us for input?”

The reason is…

Cons: I don’t have the Wayne Gretzky rookie card. Even if I came across a Gretzky rookie that someone had put in their bicycle spokes and then used it to pick up their dog’s BM, that card would still be out of my budget.

I suppose I could collect everything *but* the Gretzky rookie, but that feels like an empty achievement… and that’s why we’re discussing which set I maybe possibly should work to complete.

Hot on the heels of my favorite hockey set comes a set at the other end of the scale…

1980/81
1980-81 Topps Hockey Mike Gartner
I won’t even get into “pros” and “cons” with this; I hate this set. Out of the pack, the player names are covered with a scratch-off puck, so you can play “Who am I?” with the cards. Words cannot convey my disdain for this gimmick.

As you might have guessed, my Mike Gartner rookie is of the “already scratched” variety.

This set is a non-starter and I only mention it so that people don’t say “Hey, what about 1980/81?”

1981/82
1981-82-topps-guy-lafleur
Current Status: 114 of 132 (86%)

In the movie Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure, Ted said “Strange things are afoot at the Circle K”, and he could have been talking about this set. Rather than issuing one national hockey set in 1981, Topps issued two regional sets; both sets had the same big names for cards 1 – 66, but for cards 67 to 132 there was an “East” set which included only players with Wales Conference teams, and a “West” set which included only players from Campbell Conference teams. At the time I lived on Long Island, so the wax packs I opened had the East cards.  Meanwhile, Ted ‘Theodore’ Logan and William S. Preson, Esq. would’ve found the most triumphant West packs at their San Dimas Circle K. Excellent!

Pros: I like the design of this set, it’s kind of like 1967 baseball redesigned for the 1980’s.

Cons: If you disregard the West (which wouldn’t be part of “finishing” a set), then I’m closer to finishing than I’d realized.  I’ve only 18 commons to get, so this feels more like “I should just go ahead and complete it” than a fun challenge.


So, again, the whole point of this is “Which would you complete if you were in my shoes?”

…Or would I be better off sticking with my baseball goals?  …Especially considering that I live in an area that even an optimistic Gary Bettman in full spin mode would never confuse with “hockey country”.

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “1977-1982 Hockey: Could Someone Give Me A Push, Please?

  1. Let me know which 1977/78 hockey glossy cards you need. I collected all the major sports in the 70’s and kept many of those glossies in my “stars” box.

  2. Maybe because it’s early but my head hurts now. Dear, Roseanne Roseannadanna … Seriously though, I think I’d go with your first set. Emotional cachet is important. You might as well finsih the last one as well. It’s only a dozen and a half cards (assuming they’re not budget breakers).

  3. Out of all those, I’ve only done 78/79 (only missing card #1). But I would suggest the 79/80 set because it’s your favorite, and I’ve got a box of dupes that span the back half of the set including almost all the team cards to trade you.

  4. Why not work on all of them? I’ve never understood why anyone would ignore one set while working on another. Of course, I collect differently than most people, in that I collect everything at once knowing I won’t get everything but happy with whatever I do get.

    • What you describe is my normal M.O., but Every now and then I get in this mindset to pick a few things and put much- but not all- if my effort into it. Believe me,if I ran across a box of cheap 70’s hockey, I’ll be grabbing whatever I want, even if it’s not my main objective.

  5. ’77-’78. I was out of the hockey collecting business by then but over the years I’ve collected some late 70s hockey and this is my favorite.

  6. Can’t help you with any prior personal experience. I think the oldest set I ever built was the 1989/90 Topps set. With that being said… I really like the 77/78 design and the glossy insert set as well. I remember opening a pack of this stuff when I worked at a card shop in the early 90’s and thinking what a cool looking set.

  7. Pingback: Fashionably Late COMC Black Friday #2: Hockey | The Shlabotnik Report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s